Complaints Procedure

Introduction:

Scott Baker Property Solutions Ltd. views complaints as an opportunity to learn and improve for the future, as well as a chance to put things right for the person [or organisation] that has made the complaint. Our policy is:

To provide a fair complaints procedure which is clear and easy to use for anyone wishing to make a complaint

To publicise the existence of our complaints procedure so that people know how to contact us to make a complaint

To make sure everyone at Scott Baker Property Solutions Ltd. knows what to do if a complaint is received

To make sure all complaints are investigated fairly and in a timely way

To make sure that complaints are, wherever possible, resolved and that relationships are repaired

To gather information which helps us to improve what we do

Definition of a Complaint

A complaint is any expression of dissatisfaction, whether justified or not, about any aspect of Scott Baker Property Solutions Ltd.

Where Complaints Come From

Complaints may come from any individual or organisation who has a legitimate interest in Scott Baker Property Solutions Ltd., including the general public if something is perceived to be improper. A complaint can be received verbally, by phone, by email or in writing. This policy does not cover complaints from staff, who should refer to Scott Baker Property Solutions Ltd.’s internal policy on such matters.

Confidentiality

All complaint information will be handled sensitively, telling only those who need to know and following any relevant data protection requirements.

Responsibility

Overall responsibility for this policy and its implementation lies with the Directors of Scott Baker Property Solutions Ltd.

Review

This policy is reviewed regularly and updated as required.

Publicised Contact Details for Complaints:

Written complaints may be sent to Scott Baker Property Solutions Ltd. at Floor 5 & 6, Tower Point, 44 North Rd, Brighton BN1 1YR or by e-mail at team@thehmoplatform.co.uk

Verbal complaints may be made by phone to 01273 039111 or in person to any of Scott Baker Property Solutions Ltd.’s staff at the same address as above or at any of our events.

Receiving Complaints

Complaints may arrive through channels publicised for that purpose or through any other contact details or opportunities the complainant may have, such as social media. Complaints received by telephone or in person need to be recorded.

The person who receives a phone or in person complaint should:

Write down the facts of the complaint

Take the complainant's name, address and telephone number

Note down the relationship of the complainant to Scott Baker Property Solutions Ltd., e.g., client, volunteer, sponsor

Tell the complainant that we have a complaints procedure

Tell the complainant what will happen next and how long it will take

Where appropriate, ask the complainant to send a written account by post or by email so that the complaint is recorded in the complainant’s own words

Resolving Complaints

Stage One

In many cases, a complaint is best resolved by the person responsible for the issue being complained about. If the complaint has been received by that person, they may be able to resolve it swiftly and should do so if possible and appropriate. Whether or not the complaint has been resolved, the complaint information should be passed to the Scott Baker Property Solutions Ltd. Operations Manager within five business days.

On receiving the complaint, the Operations Manager records it in the Complaints Logbook. If it has not already been resolved, they delegate an appropriate person to investigate it and to take appropriate action. If the complaint relates to a specific person, they should be informed and given a fair opportunity to respond.

Complaints should be acknowledged by the person handling the complaint within five working days. The acknowledgement should say who is dealing with the complaint and when the person complaining can expect a reply. A copy of this complaint's procedure should be attached. Ideally complainants should receive a definitive reply within a month. If this is not possible because for example, an investigation has not been fully completed, a progress report should be sent with an indication of when a full reply will be given.

Whether the complaint is justified or not, the reply to the complainant should describe the action taken to investigate the complaint, the conclusions from the investigation, and any action taken as a result of the complaint.

Stage Two

If the complainant feels that the problem has not been satisfactorily resolved at Stage One, they can request that the complaint is reviewed at Director level.

At this stage, the complaint will be passed to the Director. The request for Director level review should be acknowledged within five working days of receiving it. The acknowledgement should say who will deal with the case and when the complainant can expect a reply.

The Directors will investigate the facts of the case themselves. This may involve reviewing the paperwork of the case and speaking with the person who dealt with the complaint at Stage One. The person who dealt with the original complaint at Stage One should be kept informed of what is happening.

If the complaint relates to a specific person, they should be informed and given a further opportunity to respond. Ideally complainants should receive a definitive reply within a month. If this is not possible because, for example, an investigation has not been fully completed, a progress report should be sent with an indication of when a full reply will be given. Whether the complaint is upheld or not, the reply to the complainant should describe the action taken to investigate the complaint, the conclusions from the investigation, and any action taken as a result of the complaint. The decision taken at this stage is final, unless the Directors decides it is appropriate to seek external assistance with resolution.

Variation of the Complaints Procedure

The Directors may vary the procedure for good reason. This may be necessary to avoid a conflict of interest, for example, a complaint about a director should not also have the Director involved as a person leading a Stage Two review.

Stage Three

If complainant is not satisfied with the outcome, then they can raise a complaint with our accredited body, the Property Investors Bureau or their appointed representative through the Property Redress Scheme.

Refer to their procedures for any further info: https://pibuk.org/docs/PEAS_Code_of_Practice.pdf

Monitoring and Learning from Complaints

Complaints are reviewed annually to identify any trends which may indicate a need to take further action